
Today's lunch is guacamole with corn thins for dipping; pasta with spinach pesto; dried fruit (cranberries, peach, apricot & date) & cashews; and an apple. Oh, and a little hand on its way to start eating that pasta a little early...

| Reactions: |

| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
| The Earthscan Reader on Adaptation to Climate Change | £16.19 - Save £3.80 - £19.99 |
| Handmade Hellos | £10.52 - Save £1.47 - £11.99 |
| Alabama Stitch Book | £14.08 - Save £5.91 - £19.99 |
| Climate Change and Global Poverty | £15.29 - Save £1.70 - £16.99 |
| Bend the Rules with Fabric | £12.04 - Save £1.28 - £13.32 |
| Handmade Home | £12.04 - Save £1.28 - £13.32 |
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |
Feminists have argued both sides of the issue of AP, and breastfeeding is a particularly volatile topic. Feminists who have argued against this practice have pointed to the ways in which it ties women down, can interrupt careers (pumping milk poses its own problems and is not a panacea), and demands sacrifice. And this is key, because forcing a woman to make a sacrifice, even having a general expectation that she make a sacrifice, is the antithesis of white, middle-class feminism. I think white middle-class feminism sees certain aspects of parenting as sacrifice and writes them off, when really, they are required aspects of parenting. I don’t mean that breastfeeding is a required aspect of parenting, but that putting yourself second and your child’s needs first is necessary for good parenting. I’m also not saying that not meeting your own needs and only meeting your child’s needs will make you a good parent. I’m simply saying that sacrifice is part of parenting.
I think that indigenous feminisms and woman-of-color feminisms and working-class feminisms have tended to get this. They have formed movements that often manage to put the community needs at the center, rather than the needs of individual women. White, middle-class feminisms have tended to call the category of “women” a community and to thereby focus on individual needs. And that’s not all bad, at all, but it’s not all good.
Dear Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee,
This is my submission to your inquiry into marriage equality. I fully endorse the submission made by Australian Marriage Equality in favour of the Marriage Equality Amendment Bill 2009.
I think that is discriminatory and embarrassing that we still deny a significant proportion of our community the equal right to marry in our country. Marriage remains an important cultural symbol of commitment and love in our society. It is the traditional way that we not only celebrate this love and commitment, but also that we symbolise the creation of a family and the adoption of someone's life partner in their extended family. Everyone should have the option of taking part in this ceremony and of having the capacity to make this important statement of their love and commitment to their family and friends.
Additionally, marriage carries with it social and legal privileges that should not be denied to anyone on the basis of their sexuality. While some of these legal privileges, such as the right to access superannuation, have (finally) recently been extended to same-sex defacto couples, many of these privileges are difficult to replicate, and equal access to marriage remains a necessary step to ensure full equality.
Equal access to marriage is a human rights issue and the passing of this Bill is an important step towards Australia becoming a country that respects the human rights of all of its citizens, regardless of their sexuality.
Yours sincerely,
Cristy Clark
| Reactions: |

| Reactions: |
| Reactions: |